David Engström

580 citations
26 papers · 481 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

David Engström

26 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

David Engström
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Media Technology 237
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 125
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 7
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 179
  • Biophysics 17
Replace Tomio Sonehara with:
Tomio Sonehara United States
Hagen Schimmel Germany
Juan Carlos Escalera Spain
Amir Hassanfiroozi Taiwan
Gal Shabtay Israel
Nobuyuki Hashimoto Japan
Hao-Yang Qiu China
David C. Dayton United States
Alexander F. Naumov Russia
David Engström relative to Tomio Sonehara United States Tomio Sonehara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Tomio Sonehara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Engström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Engström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Engström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Engström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Engström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Engström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Engström. The network helps show where David Engström may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside David Engström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Engström Line = papers co-authored together David Engström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201280
2 201374
3 200644
4 200943
5 200639
6 200831
7 201126
8 200922
9 201020
10 200615
11 200913
12 201111
13 201211
14 20047
15 20046
16 20066
17 20086
18 20085
19 20125
20 20125

About David Engström

David Engström is a scholar working on Media Technology, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 26 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (14 papers), Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (10 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (8 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (2 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (1 paper), Advanced optical system design (1 paper) and Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (237 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (125 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (7 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (179 citations) and Biophysics (17 citations). David Engström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Czechia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mattias Goksör, Jörgen Bengtsson, Martin Persson, Sheila Galt, Emma Eriksson, Mark A. Handschy, Per G. Rudquist, Koen D’havé, K. A. Bertness and Ivan I. Smalyukh. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Applied Optics, Optics Letters, Soft Matter and Ferroelectrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact