David E. Merriam

1.3k citations
5 papers · 1.2k · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 5
    • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding 1
    • Cell death mechanisms and regulation 1

David E. Merriam

5 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David E. Merriam
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Physiology 766
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 348
  • Cell Biology 242
  • Pharmacology 187
  • Neurology 93
Replace Hiroshi Hasegawa with:
Hiroshi Hasegawa Japan
A. L. Schwarzman Russia
Yongjun Gu Canada
Toolsee J. Singh United States
Olivia G. Hallmark United States
Shizu Takeda Japan
Tadashi Nakaya Japan
Charlotte Bauer France
Carol S. Himes United States
Karine Ancolio France
David E. Merriam relative to Hiroshi Hasegawa Japan Hiroshi Hasegawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hiroshi Hasegawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Merriam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Merriam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Merriam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Merriam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Merriam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Merriam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Merriam. The network helps show where David E. Merriam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Merriam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Merriam Line = papers co-authored together David E. Merriam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 1996481
2 2000307
3 1998304
4 200156
5 20019

About David E. Merriam

David E. Merriam is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), Trace Elements in Health (1 paper), Nuclear Receptors and Signaling (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (1 paper) and Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (766 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (348 citations), Cell Biology (242 citations), Pharmacology (187 citations) and Neurology (93 citations). David E. Merriam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Wilma Wasco, Annette C. Crowley, Joseph D. Buxbaum, Christina Lilliehöök, Eun‐Kyoung Choi, Yuxia Luo, Olivia G. Hallmark, Ronald Mancini, R.E. Tanzi and Robert D. Moir. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Molecular Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact