David E. Linge
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Philosophy top 1%
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Education, Philosophy, and Society
Papers in
-
- Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity 5
- Augustinian Studies and Theology 1
- Study and Philosophy of Religion 1
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 1
- Classics 1
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Byzantine Studies and History 1
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Georg Gadamer (4 shared papers)John H. Cumming (2 shared papers)Garrett Barden (2 shared papers)Sandra Lee Bartky (1 shared paper)Robert J. Matthews (1 shared paper)David G. Halliburton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Academy of Religion (3 papers)diacritics (1 paper)International Journal for Philosophy of Religion (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)The Philosophical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David E. Linge
7 papers receiving 1.4k citations
David E. Linge's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- General Psychology 45
- Philosophy 377
- Education 409
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
- Sociology and Political Science 422
Countries citing papers authored by David E. Linge
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Linge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Linge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Linge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Linge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Linge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Linge. The network helps show where David E. Linge may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside David E. Linge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Truth and Method Hit paper breakdown → | 1977 | 1618 |
| 2 | 1979 | 292 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 0 |
About David E. Linge
David E. Linge is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (5 papers), Augustinian Studies and Theology (1 paper), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Study and Philosophy of Religion (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (45 citations), Philosophy (377 citations), Education (409 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (422 citations). David E. Linge has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Georg Gadamer, John H. Cumming, Garrett Barden, Sandra Lee Bartky, Robert J. Matthews and David G. Halliburton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Religion, diacritics, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.