David E. Junker

546 citations
11 papers · 462 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Junker

11 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

David E. Junker
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Animal Science and Zoology 240
  • Infectious Diseases 198
  • Virology 18
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
  • Epidemiology 120
Replace A. J. Forman with:
A. J. Forman Australia
Kyle S. Hain United States
Alice Mundt Germany
Enric Espuña Spain
Yuening Cheng China
D Lütticken United States
Amirali N. Hamir United States
Denise H. Thörnton United Arab Emirates
Yosaburo Otaki Japan
H. K. Shieh Taiwan
David E. Junker relative to A. J. Forman Australia A. J. Forman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
A. J. Forman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Junker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Junker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Junker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Junker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Junker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Junker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Junker. The network helps show where David E. Junker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David E. Junker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Junker Line = papers co-authored together David E. Junker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1993171
2 199875
3 198549
4 200639
5 199928
6 198628
7
The safe and effective use of fowlpox virus as a vector for poultry vaccines.
199423
8 200221
9 200315
10 202112
11
EFFICACY OF INTRADERMAL VACCINATION AGAINST CHALLENGE OF SWINE WITH A HETEROLOGOUS H3N2 SWINE INFLUENZA VIRUS
20031

About David E. Junker

David E. Junker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Virology, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Epidemiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (3 papers), Poxvirus research and outbreaks (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (240 citations), Infectious Diseases (198 citations), Virology (18 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations) and Epidemiology (120 citations). David E. Junker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Whited Collisson, Li Wang, Barbara J. Winslow, Mark D. Cochran, JAGDEV M. SHARMA, Janis McMillen, Benjamin William Zweifach, F. A. DeLano, Ke‐seng Zhao and Kemal Karaca. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Virology, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Microvascular Research and Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact