David Christopher

27 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

David Christopher
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pharmaceutical Science 99
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 200
  • Statistics and Probability 49
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 25
  • Food Science 60
Replace Bing V. Li with:
Bing V. Li United States
Charles Bon United States
Changning Guo United States
Eric Ormsby Canada
Bhawana Saluja United States
Jens Markus Borghardt Germany
J. B. Schwartz United States
Renishkumar Delvadia United States
Susan P. Duke United States
R. J. E. Grouls Netherlands
David Christopher relative to Bing V. Li United States Bing V. Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Bing V. Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Christopher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Christopher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Christopher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Christopher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Christopher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Christopher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Christopher. The network helps show where David Christopher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Christopher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Christopher Line = papers co-authored together David Christopher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201278
2 201245
3 201543
4 198137
5 200834
6 200721
7 200721
8 200916
9 200716
10 200915
11 19959
12 19978
13 20177
14 20137
15 20196
16 20195
17 20075
18 20095
19 20135
20 20094

About David Christopher

David Christopher is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Statistics and Probability, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Food Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 30 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (10 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (8 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (5 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (99 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (200 citations), Statistics and Probability (49 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (25 citations) and Food Science (60 citations). David Christopher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Svetlana Lyapustina, Terrence P. Tougas, Jolyon P. Mitchell, Leon Sloman, Monisha Dey, Per Bäckman, Myrna Dolovich, James R. Schwenke, Michelle Quinlan and Ben Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as AAPS PharmSciTech, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, The AAPS Journal, BMC Bioinformatics and The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact