David Chambers

45 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Strategy and Management 321
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 170
  • Accounting 186
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Management Information Systems 102
Replace Howard L. Smith with:
Howard L. Smith United States
Melvin Prince United States
Howard P. Tuckman United States
Lin Ding United States
Elizabeth West United Kingdom
Myron D. Fottler United States
I-Ju Chen Taiwan
Stephen Strasser United States
Kate Stewart United States
Stephen O’Connor United States
David Chambers relative to Howard L. Smith United States Howard L. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Howard L. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Chambers. The network helps show where David Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Chambers Line = papers co-authored together David Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998464
2 2001210
3 2009121
4 200170
5 200241
6 200438
7 200437
8 202330
9 200430
10 201330
11 200526
12 196725
13 198024
14 201723
15 201023
16 197118
17 201318
18 200317
19 200317
20 198516

About David Chambers

David Chambers is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Accounting, Finance, Molecular Biology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (10 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (8 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (5 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (4 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (4 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (4 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (4 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (321 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (170 citations), Accounting (186 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations) and Management Information Systems (102 citations). David Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Spyros Lioukas, Vassilis Papadakis, Louise Locock, Sue Dopson, John Gabbay, Antony J. Fairbanks, Graham Evans, Brian R. Cheffins, Kailash P. Bhatia and R. C. CAMBIE. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Tetrahedron, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia and The Economic History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact