David Bliss

554 citations
5 papers · 58 · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Astro and Planetary Science
    • Planetary Science and Exploration
    • Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
    • Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
    • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
    • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Papers in

David Bliss

5 papers receiving 51 citations

Peers

David Bliss
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 50
  • Space and Planetary Science 2
  • Conservation 4
  • Museology 3
  • Atmospheric Science 14
Replace Robert Zimdar with:
Robert Zimdar United States
D. Noss Germany
Leslie Lipkaman United States
Ryan Anderson United States
S. Dickenshied United States
A. Grigoriev Russia
Lauren Edgar
Daniel Krysak United States
Mike Hankey United States
K. Leer Germany
David Bliss relative to Robert Zimdar United States Robert Zimdar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Zimdar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Bliss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Bliss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bliss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bliss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Bliss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bliss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bliss. The network helps show where David Bliss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside David Bliss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Bliss Line = papers co-authored together David Bliss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 198950
2 20195
3 20101
4 20181
5 20041

About David Bliss

David Bliss is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computer Networks and Communications, Oceanography and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 5 papers that have together received 58 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (2 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (2 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (2 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (1 paper), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Planetary Science and Exploration (1 paper) and Spacecraft Design and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (50 citations), Space and Planetary Science (2 citations), Conservation (4 citations), Museology (3 citations) and Atmospheric Science (14 citations). David Bliss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include K. E. Simmons, C. W. Hord, B. J. Buratti, J. E. Colwell, W. D. Smythe, Arthur L. Lane, Robert A. West, Robert M. Nelson, W. R. Pryor and P. A. Yanamandra-Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SpaceOps 2010 Conference, 2018 SpaceOps Conference and NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact