David Arase
Impact in
- Development top 1%
- International Development and Aid
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Asian Industrial and Economic Development
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
Papers in
-
- International Relations and Foreign Policy 8
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 6
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography 4
- Development 12
- International Development and Aid 12
- Co-authors
- Ronald Dore (1 shared paper)David M. Potter (1 shared paper)Peter Gourevitch (1 shared paper)Takashi Inoguchi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Asian Survey (6 papers)Journal of Japanese Studies (3 papers)Pacific Affairs (3 papers)Political Science Quarterly (2 papers)The Pacific Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoChina
In The Last Decade
David Arase
37 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Development 194
- Political Science and International Relations 294
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 56
- Cultural Studies 39
- Sociology and Political Science 208
Countries citing papers authored by David Arase
This map shows the geographic impact of David Arase's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Arase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Arase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Arase
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Arase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Arase. The network helps show where David Arase may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside David Arase, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buying Power: The Political Economy of Japan's Foreign Aid | 1995 | 83 |
| 2 | 1993 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 50 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 5 |
About David Arase
David Arase is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Development, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Demography, having authored 41 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (12 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (4 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (4 papers), China's Global Influence and Migration (3 papers) and International Business and FDI (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (194 citations), Political Science and International Relations (294 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (56 citations), Cultural Studies (39 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (208 citations). David Arase has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and China. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Dore, David M. Potter, Peter Gourevitch and Takashi Inoguchi. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, Journal of Japanese Studies, Pacific Affairs, Political Science Quarterly and The Pacific Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.