David Ames

91 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

David Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 115
  • Biological Psychiatry 120
  • Physiology 1.0k
  • Neurology 287
Replace Yen Ying Lim with:
Yen Ying Lim Australia
Félix Bermejo‐Pareja Spain
Alan J. Lerner United States
Jong Inn Woo South Korea
Mary C. Tierney Canada
Inez H.G.B. Ramakers Netherlands
Pierre Krolak‐Salmon France
Amy Borenstein Graves United States
Armin von Gunten Switzerland
David Bachman United States
David Ames relative to Yen Ying Lim Australia Yen Ying Lim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Yen Ying Lim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ames. The network helps show where David Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Ames Line = papers co-authored together David Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997327
2 2008326
3 2009300
4 2012262
5 2013226
6 2008186
7 2012148
8 1996141
9 2013140
10 1994110
11 2014107
12 201299
13 201497
14 201397
15 200478
16 198853
17 200151
18 200843
19 200442
20 201641

About David Ames

David Ames is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Clinical Psychology and Neurology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (38 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.6k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (115 citations), Biological Psychiatry (120 citations), Physiology (1.0k citations) and Neurology (287 citations). David Ames has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ralph N. Martins, Colin L. Masters, Kathryn A. Ellis, Henry J. Jackson, Christina Bryant, Cassandra Szoeke, William C. Wirshing, Christopher C. Rowe, Victor L. Villemagne and Pierrick Bourgeat. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, International Psychogeriatrics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry and Translational Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact