Danielle Peers

757 citations
32 papers · 448 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Peers

29 papers receiving 414 citations

Peers

Danielle Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Safety Research 186
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 46
  • Gender Studies 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 321
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Bethan Kingsley with:
Bethan Kingsley Canada
Carwyn Jones United Kingdom
Brent Hardin United States
Sharon Kay Stoll United States
Robin C. Parker United States
Nikki Wedgwood Australia
Reinhard Haudenhuyse Belgium
Cathy van Ingen Canada
Charlene S. Shannon Canada
Duke Peltier Canada
Danielle Peers relative to Bethan Kingsley Canada Bethan Kingsley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bethan Kingsley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Peers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Peers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Peers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Peers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Peers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Peers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Peers. The network helps show where Danielle Peers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Peers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Peers Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Peers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200974
2 201474
3 201255
4 201235
5 201130
6 202322
7 201315
8 201813
9 202013
10 201213
11 202012
12 202211
13 202211
14 201611
15 202211
16 20208
17 20197
18 20205
19 20164
20 20174

About Danielle Peers

Danielle Peers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disability Rights and Representation (12 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (7 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (7 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (5 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (4 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers) and Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (186 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (46 citations), Gender Studies (94 citations), Sociology and Political Science (321 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Danielle Peers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Nancy Spencer-Cavaliere, Lisa N. Tink, Bethan Kingsley, Candace I. J. Nykiforuk, William Bridel, Janelle Joseph, Robert McRuer, Nicole M. Glenn, Kelsey J.R.P. Byers and Laura Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, Leisure/Loisir, Sociology of Sport Journal, The American Naturalist and Feminist Legal Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact