Danielle Kellier

558 citations
5 papers · 16 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Kellier

4 papers receiving 16 citations

Peers

Danielle Kellier
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 9
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 3
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4
  • Pharmacy 1
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1
Replace Emily Potts with:
Emily Potts United States
Tanveer Shaukat United States
L.-C. Lee United States
Michael Miklos United States
Emily Hart United States
C. Fabby United States
Karin Moses Australia
J. Fuster Spain
Lee Tbaily United Kingdom
Chloe Macdonald United Kingdom
Danielle Kellier relative to Emily Potts United States Emily Potts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emily Potts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Kellier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Kellier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Kellier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Kellier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Kellier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Kellier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Kellier. The network helps show where Danielle Kellier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Kellier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Kellier Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Kellier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 20218
2 20224
3 20233
4 20241
5 20240

About Danielle Kellier

Danielle Kellier is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 16 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (1 paper), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper) and Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (9 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (3 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4 citations), Pharmacy (1 citation) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1 citation). Danielle Kellier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christina Bergmann, Nichelle Raj, Andrew D. Hershey, Michael C. Frank, Caroline F. Rowland, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Jesse Y. Hsu, John T. Farrar, Virginia A. Marchman and Christina L. Szperka. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Science, Neurology, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain and Cephalalgia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact