Danielle Kellier

586 citations
6 papers · 16 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Danielle Kellier

4 papers receiving 16 citations

Peers

Danielle Kellier
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 9
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4
  • Pharmacy 1
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2
Replace Michael Miklos with:
Michael Miklos United States
Tanveer Shaukat United States
Daniel Hindley United Kingdom
Marc Lyons Australia
Sadia Jabeen Khan Bangladesh
Alberto Orso Maria Iorio Argentina
Khurotul Aini Indonesia
Agus Mahendra Indonesia
Chloe Macdonald Australia
Anna María Claverol Carrera United States
Danielle Kellier relative to Michael Miklos United States Michael Miklos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Michael Miklos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Kellier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Kellier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Kellier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Kellier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Kellier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Kellier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Kellier. The network helps show where Danielle Kellier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Danielle Kellier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Danielle Kellier Line = papers co-authored together Danielle Kellier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 20218
2 20224
3 20233
4 20241
5 20250
6 20240

About Danielle Kellier

Danielle Kellier is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 6 papers that have together received 16 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (1 paper), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (9 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (4 citations), Pharmacy (1 citation), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1 citation) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2 citations). Danielle Kellier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Virginia A. Marchman, Michael C. Frank, Christina L. Szperka, Mika Braginsky, Blanca Marquez de Prado, Caroline F. Rowland, Christina Bergmann, Andrew D. Hershey, Nichelle Raj and Jesse Y. Hsu. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Developmental Science, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Cephalalgia and MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact