Daniela Tedeschi

1.5k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Tedeschi

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniela Tedeschi
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 275
  • Clinical Psychology 370
  • Equine 28
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Applied Psychology 63
Replace Luisa De Risio with:
Luisa De Risio Italy
Andrzej Jakubczyk Poland
Bernhard Croissant Germany
Harry Man Xiong Lai Australia
Tiziano Acciavatti Italy
Joëlle A. Pasman Netherlands
Alain Dervaux France
Sabine Hoffmann Germany
Clarissa Maria Ferreira Trzesniak Brazil
Lara Grau‐López Spain
Daniela Tedeschi relative to Luisa De Risio Italy Luisa De Risio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Luisa De Risio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Tedeschi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Tedeschi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Tedeschi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Tedeschi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Tedeschi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Tedeschi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Tedeschi. The network helps show where Daniela Tedeschi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Tedeschi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Tedeschi Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Tedeschi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009117
2 2015108
3 201096
4 200877
5 201174
6 200965
7 200962
8 201761
9 201060
10 201259
11 200846
12 201044
13 201542
14 201342
15 201041
16 201329
17 200327
18 201024
19 201218
20 201118

About Daniela Tedeschi

Daniela Tedeschi is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Equine, Neurology and Rehabilitation, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (3 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (275 citations), Clinical Psychology (370 citations), Equine (28 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations) and Applied Psychology (63 citations). Daniela Tedeschi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Martinotti, Luigi Janiri, Marco Di Nicola, Gino Pozzi, Marianna Mazza, Massimo Di Giannantonio, Pietro Bria, Antonino Callea, Valeria Catalano and Marco Sarchiapone. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, American Journal on Addictions and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact