Daniela Strelchuk

429 citations
18 papers · 280 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Strelchuk

18 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Daniela Strelchuk
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 154
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 112
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Philosophy 46
  • Clinical Psychology 72
Replace Joel S. Peterman with:
Joel S. Peterman United States
Michael Katzev Germany
Mariachiara Longarzo Italy
Mirjam Rentrop Germany
Laurent Lecardeur France
Margaret Newson United Kingdom
Yasuhiro Matsuda Japan
Jessica P.Y. Hua United States
Suzanne M. Shdo United States
Mauro Pallagrosi Italy
Daniela Strelchuk relative to Joel S. Peterman United States Joel S. Peterman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joel S. Peterman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Strelchuk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Strelchuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Strelchuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Strelchuk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Strelchuk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Strelchuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Strelchuk. The network helps show where Daniela Strelchuk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Strelchuk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Strelchuk Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Strelchuk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201766
2 201536
3 202031
4 201728
5 201727
6 201722
7 201717
8 202011
9 20218
10 20207
11 20226
12 20175
13 20234
14 20204
15 20173
16 20233
17 20241
18 20171

About Daniela Strelchuk

Daniela Strelchuk is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Related Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (154 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (112 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations), Philosophy (46 citations) and Clinical Psychology (72 citations). Daniela Strelchuk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Valerie Voon, Kwangyeol Baek, Nuria Doñamayor, Stanley Zammit, Michael S. Zandi, Laurel Morris, Cathy Walsh, Wendy J. Phillips, Jazz Croft and Simon Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, NeuroImage Clinical, Psychological Medicine, British Journal of General Practice and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact