Daniela Pinter

61 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniela Pinter
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Neurology 153
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 298
  • Neurology 213
  • Rehabilitation 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 115
Replace Marta Altieri with:
Marta Altieri Italy
Giovanna Carlucci Italy
Silvia Di Legge Italy
Susanna Horner Austria
Andreas Schwartz Germany
Sara Shams Sweden
Fabrice Vuillier France
Abdülkadir Koçer Türkiye
Alberto Romagnolo Italy
Tjemme Beems Netherlands
Daniela Pinter relative to Marta Altieri Italy Marta Altieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Marta Altieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Pinter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Pinter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Pinter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Pinter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Pinter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Pinter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Pinter. The network helps show where Daniela Pinter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Pinter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Pinter Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Pinter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017142
2 201797
3 202179
4 201572
5 201565
6 201448
7 202035
8 201834
9 202033
10 201532
11 201531
12 201828
13 201627
14 202125
15 201723
16 202021
17 202120
18 201919
19 201619
20 201819

About Daniela Pinter

Daniela Pinter is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (20 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (153 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (298 citations), Neurology (213 citations), Rehabilitation (70 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (115 citations). Daniela Pinter has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Enzinger, Franz Fazekas, Thomas Gattringer, Michael Khalil, Stefan Ropele, Alexander Pichler, Simon Fandler‐Höfler, Lukas Pirpamer, Siegrid Fuchs and Markus Kneihsl. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, Neurology, Journal of Neurology and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact