Daniela Pinter

1.8k citations
70 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Pinter

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Daniela Pinter
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 367
  • Neurology 270
  • Rehabilitation 103
  • Neurology 106
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 184
Replace Marta Altieri with:
Marta Altieri Italy
Giovanna Carlucci Italy
Bum Sun Kwon South Korea
Raffaele Dubbioso Italy
Fukashi Udaka Japan
Marcello C. Romano Italy
Andre Carvalho Felicio Brazil
Mauro Comola Italy
Neşe Çelebisoy Türkiye
Hiroaki Oguro Japan
Daniela Pinter relative to Marta Altieri Italy Marta Altieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Marta Altieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Pinter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Pinter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Pinter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Pinter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Pinter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Pinter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Pinter. The network helps show where Daniela Pinter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Pinter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Pinter Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Pinter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017162
2 2017102
3 202192
4 201577
5 201567
6 202449
7 201448
8 201841
9 202036
10 201534
11 202034
12 201531
13 201831
14 202128
15 201627
16 201724
17 202024
18 201922
19 202222
20 201620

About Daniela Pinter

Daniela Pinter is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Rehabilitation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (26 papers), Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders (11 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (367 citations), Neurology (270 citations), Rehabilitation (103 citations), Neurology (106 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (184 citations). Daniela Pinter has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian Enzinger, Franz Fazekas, Thomas Gattringer, Stefan Ropele, Michael Khalil, Alexander Pichler, Simon Fandler‐Höfler, Lukas Pirpamer, Markus Kneihsl and Reinhold Ernst Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, Neurology, Journal of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact