Daniela Monaldi

1.0k citations
11 papers · 34 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Monaldi

8 papers receiving 30 citations

Peers

Daniela Monaldi
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • History and Philosophy of Science 22
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 9
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 16
  • Statistics and Probability 3
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 4
Replace Lewis Campbell with:
Lewis Campbell
Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi Germany
Oliver Lodge
A. Lemut United States
Радий Иванович Илькаев Russia
J. Martens Netherlands
T. D. Gutierrez United States
R. Mele Italy
Maxim Goncharov Switzerland
Taylan Yetkin Türkiye
Daniela Monaldi relative to Lewis Campbell Lewis Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lewis Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Monaldi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Monaldi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Monaldi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Monaldi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Monaldi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Monaldi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Monaldi. The network helps show where Daniela Monaldi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Monaldi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Monaldi Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Monaldi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 200912
2 20057
3 20134
4 20173
5 20192
6 20082
7 19902
8
The fate of the mesotron. The Rome experiment on the nuclear absorption of hard cosmic rays
20051
9
Measurement of the fractional momentum carried by the gluons in the low Q squared photon-gluon fusion events at the ep HERA collider
19891
10 20130
11 20210

About Daniela Monaldi

Daniela Monaldi is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 11 papers that have together received 34 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (3 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), History of Science and Medicine (2 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (22 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (9 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (16 citations), Statistics and Probability (3 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (4 citations). Daniela Monaldi has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include G. D’Agostini and G. D’Agostini. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, Annals of Science, The European Physical Journal C, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte and Isis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact