Daniela H. Haarmeyer
Impact in
- Forestry top 5%
- African Botany and Ecology Studies
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 3
- Ecology 2
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 1
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Jürgen Dengler (4 shared papers)Ute Schmiedel (3 shared papers)Rüdiger Wittig (1 shared paper)Katharina Schumann (1 shared paper)Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann (1 shared paper)Adjima Thiombiano (1 shared paper)Karen Hahn (1 shared paper)Jörg U. Ganzhorn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Agroforestry Systems (1 paper)Journal of Arid Environments (1 paper)Biological Conservation (1 paper)South African Journal of Botany (1 paper)elib (German Aerospace Center) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomBurkina Faso
In The Last Decade
Daniela H. Haarmeyer
5 papers receiving 115 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Forestry 43
- Horticulture 5
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 57
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 43
- Ecological Modeling 9
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela H. Haarmeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela H. Haarmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela H. Haarmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela H. Haarmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela H. Haarmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela H. Haarmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela H. Haarmeyer. The network helps show where Daniela H. Haarmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniela H. Haarmeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 4 | The BIOTA Observatories | 2010 | 13 |
| 5 | 2010 | 10 |
About Daniela H. Haarmeyer
Daniela H. Haarmeyer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Forestry, Horticulture and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 120 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (1 paper), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper), Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (1 paper) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (43 citations), Horticulture (5 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (57 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (43 citations) and Ecological Modeling (9 citations). Daniela H. Haarmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Burkina Faso. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Dengler, Ute Schmiedel, Rüdiger Wittig, Katharina Schumann, Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann, Adjima Thiombiano, Karen Hahn, Jörg U. Ganzhorn and Manfred Keil. Their work appears in journals such as Agroforestry Systems, Journal of Arid Environments, Biological Conservation, South African Journal of Botany and elib (German Aerospace Center).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.