Daniela Ghio
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 8
-
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques 9
- Co-authors
- Ingrid Müller (11 shared papers)Miriam Santer (11 shared papers)Amanda Roberts (7 shared papers)Kate Greenwell (6 shared papers)Lis Cordingley (8 shared papers)Lucy Yardley (5 shared papers)Wendy Thomson (6 shared papers)Katy Sivyer (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (3 papers)Journal of Advanced Nursing (3 papers)BMC Family Practice (2 papers)British Journal of Health Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Pediatric Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyCanada
In The Last Decade
Daniela Ghio
39 papers receiving 507 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Dermatology 109
- Applied Psychology 35
- Pharmacy 24
- Health 58
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Ghio
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Ghio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Ghio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Ghio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Ghio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Ghio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Ghio. The network helps show where Daniela Ghio may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Ghio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 8 |
About Daniela Ghio
Daniela Ghio is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Modeling and Simulation, Pharmacy and General Health Professions, having authored 43 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (8 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (5 papers), Infant Health and Development (4 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers) and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (109 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations), Pharmacy (24 citations), Health (58 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (52 citations). Daniela Ghio has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ingrid Müller, Miriam Santer, Amanda Roberts, Kate Greenwell, Lis Cordingley, Lucy Yardley, Wendy Thomson, Katy Sivyer, Abigail McNiven and Emma J. Teasdale. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Family Practice, British Journal of Health Psychology and Journal of Pediatric Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.