Daniela Dremmel

406 citations
9 papers · 255 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Dremmel

8 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Daniela Dremmel
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Clinical Psychology 196
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 116
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 79
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 5
  • Pharmacy 4
Replace Jenny H. Jo with:
Jenny H. Jo United States
Olivia Wons United States
Julie O’Toole United States
Simone Raenker United Kingdom
Cathleen Steinegger Canada
D. N. Mendhekar India
Snežana M. Divac France
Maddalena Conti Italy
Aimee E. Sullivan United States
Carla Comacchio Italy
Daniela Dremmel relative to Jenny H. Jo United States Jenny H. Jo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
Jenny H. Jo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Dremmel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Dremmel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Dremmel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Dremmel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Dremmel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Dremmel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Dremmel. The network helps show where Daniela Dremmel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Dremmel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Dremmel Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Dremmel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2014139
2 201535
3 201433
4 201615
5 201812
6 201310
7 20178
8 20193
9 20130

About Daniela Dremmel

Daniela Dremmel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies (1 paper), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper) and Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (196 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (116 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (79 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (5 citations) and Pharmacy (4 citations). Daniela Dremmel has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Simone Munsch, Anja Hilbert, Susanne Kurz, Zoé Van Dyck, Andrea H. Meyer, Barbara Schlup, Sophia Fischer, Susann Blüher, Ricarda Schmidt and Dominik Schoebi. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Eating Disorders, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, European Eating Disorders Review, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Appetite.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact