Daniela Billi

3.6k citations
84 papers · 3k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Billi

78 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Daniela Billi
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 850
  • Ecology 460
  • Earth-Surface Processes 128
  • Environmental Chemistry 135
Replace Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera with:
Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera Germany
Elke Rabbow Germany
Karen Olsson‐Francis United Kingdom
Benito Gómez‐Silva Chile
Joseph Seckbach Israel
Silvano Onofri Italy
Sieglinde Ott Germany
Helga Stan‐Lotter Austria
R. Ocampo‐Friedmann United States
Laura Zucconi Italy
Daniela Billi relative to Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera Germany Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Billi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Billi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Billi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Billi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Billi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Billi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Billi. The network helps show where Daniela Billi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Billi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Billi Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Billi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000323
2 2002303
3 2005164
4 2015148
5 2019120
6 2012102
7 200080
8 200876
9 201268
10 200167
11 200862
12 201357
13 201757
14 201155
15 199651
16 199651
17 199851
18 201951
19 201247
20 201747

About Daniela Billi

Daniela Billi is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics and Physiology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (35 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (32 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (31 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (10 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (8 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (7 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (6 papers) and Tardigrade Biology and Ecology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (850 citations), Ecology (460 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (128 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (135 citations). Daniela Billi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Potts, M. Grilli Caiola, E. Imre Friedmann, Mickaël Baqué, Cyprien Verseux, Jean-Pierre Paul De Vera, Kurt G. Hofer, Patrizia B. Albertano, R. Ocampo‐Friedmann and Claudia Fagliarone. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Astrobiology, Astrobiology, Life, Frontiers in Microbiology and Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact