Daniel Zapp

1.3k citations
48 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Zapp

44 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniel Zapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Ophthalmology 328
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 482
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 210
  • Biomedical Engineering 240
  • Gender Studies 39
Replace George M. Saleh with:
George M. Saleh United Kingdom
Mark Dunne United Kingdom
Bruce Burkemper United States
Nicola S. Logan United Kingdom
Sanjeev Kasthurirangan United States
Carly Siu Yin Lam Hong Kong
Paulo Schor Brazil
Allan Fong Singapore
Amy L. Sheppard United Kingdom
José J. Esteve‐Taboada Spain
Daniel Zapp relative to George M. Saleh United Kingdom George M. Saleh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
George M. Saleh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Zapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Zapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Zapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Zapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Zapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Zapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Zapp. The network helps show where Daniel Zapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Zapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Zapp Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Zapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016113
2 201398
3 201096
4 200690
5 201983
6 201767
7 202054
8 200644
9 201842
10 201338
11 200536
12 201427
13 201825
14 201524
15 201824
16 201823
17 201823
18 201815
19 202114
20 201914

About Daniel Zapp

Daniel Zapp is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Biomedical Engineering, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal and Macular Surgery (12 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (11 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (7 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (5 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (5 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (328 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (482 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (210 citations), Biomedical Engineering (240 citations) and Gender Studies (39 citations). Daniel Zapp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Anselm Kampik, Elisabeth M. Messmer, Chris P. Lohmann, Mathias Maier, M. Ali Nasseri, Marc J. Mackert, Alois Knoll, Theo Seiler, Isaak Fischinger and C. Schmid-Tannwald. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, BMC Ophthalmology and IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact