Daniel W. Mudrick

15 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Mudrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 174
  • Nephrology 48
  • Epidemiology 209
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
  • Surgery 117
Replace Göksel Çinier with:
Göksel Çinier Türkiye
M Röthlin Switzerland
MaryAnn M. Murakami United States
Chih-Huang Li Taiwan
Alejandro Sánchez-Nadales United States
Murat Selçuk Türkiye
Sandeep Sahu India
Pravin Manga South Africa
Gustavo Jardim Volpe Brazil
Won Kyoung Jhang South Korea
Daniel W. Mudrick relative to Göksel Çinier Türkiye Göksel Çinier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Göksel Çinier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Mudrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Mudrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Mudrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Mudrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Mudrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Mudrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Mudrick. The network helps show where Daniel W. Mudrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Mudrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Mudrick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Mudrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014188
2 2002159
3 2014103
4 201232
5 200430
6 200329
7 201318
8 201213
9 201211
10 201010
11 20108
12 20105
13 20185
14 20124
15 20133

About Daniel W. Mudrick

Daniel W. Mudrick is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Epidemiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (6 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (3 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (174 citations), Nephrology (48 citations), Epidemiology (209 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (134 citations) and Surgery (117 citations). Daniel W. Mudrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Pamela S. Douglas, Michel Skaf, Nazareno Paolocci, Garrick C. Stewart, David A. Kass, Joshua M. Hare, Eduardo Marbán, Joshua Zeichner, Robert W. Harrison and Manesh R. Patel. Their work appears in journals such as American Heart Journal, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Circulation, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact