Daniel W. Leger

1.6k citations
48 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel W. Leger

45 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel W. Leger
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Developmental Biology 493
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 699
  • Health Informatics 29
  • Ecology 481
  • Social Psychology 334
Replace W. J. Bernhard Smith with:
W. J. Bernhard Smith United States
Ken Marten United States
Soila Sayialel United Kingdom
Oren Hasson Israel
Yngve Espmark Norway
Benjamin J. Pitcher Australia
Jacob C. Dunn United Kingdom
Antonio Souto Brazil
Leanne T. Nash United States
Kelly J. Stewart United Kingdom
Daniel W. Leger relative to W. J. Bernhard Smith United States W. J. Bernhard Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. J. Bernhard Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Leger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Leger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Leger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Leger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Leger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Leger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Leger. The network helps show where Daniel W. Leger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Leger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Leger Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Leger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994134
2 198092
3 197882
4 198674
5 199757
6 197755
7 198153
8 198449
9 198347
10 199743
11 202242
12
Evolutionary psychology and motivation
200141
13
Comparative perspectives in modern psychology.
198741
14 199633
15 199333
16 199632
17 199031
18 199229
19 199929
20 200121

About Daniel W. Leger

Daniel W. Leger is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology, Ecology, Social Psychology and Genetics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (20 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (19 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers), Marine animal studies overview (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (493 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (699 citations), Health Informatics (29 citations), Ecology (481 citations) and Social Psychology (334 citations). Daniel W. Leger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Donald H. Owings, Jeffrey A. French, Richard G. Coss, D. James Mountjoy, Paul W. Sherman, Alan C. Kamil, Matthew P. Rowe, Terri L. Bonebright, Richard A. Dienstbier and Ross A. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, The Auk, Journal of comparative psychology, Behaviour and Animal Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact