Daniel W. Good

30 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Daniel W. Good
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 138
  • Surgery 106
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 54
  • Urology 14
  • Epidemiology 68
Replace Peter Struve with:
Peter Struve Austria
Kevin Magee United States
Margit Bauer Austria
Paul G. Newman United States
Allan Northeved Denmark
B. Keegan Markhardt United States
Kazutoshi Okamura Japan
Tsuyoshi Mitake Japan
Michael Fernandez United States
Zewei Zhang China
Daniel W. Good relative to Peter Struve Austria Peter Struve's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Peter Struve · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Good

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Good's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Good with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Good more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Good

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Good. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Good. The network helps show where Daniel W. Good may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel W. Good, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel W. Good Line = papers co-authored together Daniel W. Good links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201360
2 201159
3 201459
4 201255
5 201529
6 201327
7 201421
8 201518
9 201717
10 201311
11 201111
12 201111
13 20138
14 20148
15 20177
16 20177
17 20117
18 20157
19 20136
20 20175

About Daniel W. Good

Daniel W. Good is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 30 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (5 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (5 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (138 citations), Surgery (106 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (54 citations), Urology (14 citations) and Epidemiology (68 citations). Daniel W. Good has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Grant D. Stewart, S. Alan McNeill, Darren F. Lui, Michael Leonard, Seamus Morris, John P. McElwain, R.L. Reuben, Simon Phipps, Alexander Laird and Wenmiao Shu. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Urology, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, Journal of Endourology, World Journal of Urology and Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H Journal of Engineering in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact