Daniel T. Jackson

16 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Daniel T. Jackson
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 198
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 205
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 16
  • Social Psychology 45
  • Economics and Econometrics 31
Replace James H. Dugdale with:
James H. Dugdale United Kingdom
Guy Parkin United Kingdom
Daniel Leyhr Germany
Joana Ribeiro Portugal
Dennis Murr Germany
Marjan Moosavi Singapore
Marc Zibung Switzerland
Claudia Zuber Switzerland
Neil McCarthy United Kingdom
Luís Vaz Portugal
Daniel T. Jackson relative to James H. Dugdale United Kingdom James H. Dugdale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James H. Dugdale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel T. Jackson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel T. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel T. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel T. Jackson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel T. Jackson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel T. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel T. Jackson. The network helps show where Daniel T. Jackson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel T. Jackson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel T. Jackson Line = papers co-authored together Daniel T. Jackson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201957
2 202136
3 202036
4 202034
5 202127
6 202021
7 202316
8 20229
9 20209
10 20249
11 20218
12 20216
13 19914
14 19793
15 20212
16
Retraining function with exercise based computer games for people with Parkinson's disease: PD-Kinection
20131
17 20240

About Daniel T. Jackson

Daniel T. Jackson is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Occupational Therapy and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (11 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (11 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (8 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (198 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (205 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (16 citations), Social Psychology (45 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (31 citations). Daniel T. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adam L. Kelly, Craig A. Williams, Jennifer Turnnidge, Mark Wilson, Paul T. Morgan, Kate Burke, Lewis A. Gough, Matthew Cole, Kevin Till and Jean Côté. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Medicine in Football, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, Omega, Journal of Sports Sciences and High Ability Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact