Daniel Stevens

1.4k citations
58 papers · 882 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Stevens

55 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Daniel Stevens
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Communication 215
  • Political Science and International Relations 414
  • Gender Studies 137
  • Sociology and Political Science 559
  • Development 20
Replace Umut Korkut with:
Umut Korkut United Kingdom
Eelco Harteveld Netherlands
Amy Erica Smith United States
Shaul R. Shenhav Israel
Ov Cristian Norocel Sweden
Wenfang Tang United States
Wanning Sun Australia
James Dennison Italy
Marisa Abrajano United States
Sofia Vasilopoulou United Kingdom
Daniel Stevens relative to Umut Korkut United Kingdom Umut Korkut's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Umut Korkut · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Stevens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Stevens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Stevens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Stevens. The network helps show where Daniel Stevens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Stevens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Stevens Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Stevens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015124
2 200590
3 200660
4 200847
5 201446
6 200937
7 201327
8 200526
9 200926
10 201622
11 201221
12 201618
13 201618
14 201118
15 201017
16 200717
17 200516
18 201516
19 201216
20 201514

About Daniel Stevens

Daniel Stevens is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Gender Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 58 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (34 papers), Social Media and Politics (17 papers), Media Influence and Politics (11 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (5 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (215 citations), Political Science and International Relations (414 citations), Gender Studies (137 citations), Sociology and Political Science (559 citations) and Development (20 citations). Daniel Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Nick Vaughan‐Williams, Susan Banducci, Benjamin G. Bishin, Bárbara Allen, John L. Sullivan, John L. Sullivan, George E. Marcus, Elizabeth Theiss‐Morse, Robert R. Barr and Jeffrey A. Karp. Their work appears in journals such as Electoral Studies, Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties, Political Behavior, British Journal of Political Science and Political Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact