Daniel Selchen

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Selchen
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 520
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 124
  • Neurology 232
  • Developmental Neuroscience 33
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 32
Replace Willem Pondaag with:
Willem Pondaag Netherlands
Wolfgang Müllges Germany
Joel C. Morgenlander United States
Jeffery P. Hogg United States
Rob J. M. Groen Netherlands
Zehra Akpınar Türkiye
Clark Watts United States
Bizhan Aarabi United States
Bong-Jae Lee South Korea
G E Venn United Kingdom
Daniel Selchen relative to Willem Pondaag Netherlands Willem Pondaag's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Willem Pondaag · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Selchen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Selchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Selchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Selchen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Selchen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Selchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Selchen. The network helps show where Daniel Selchen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Selchen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Selchen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Selchen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012162
2 2013157
3 200482
4 199177
5
Treatment experience, burden, and unmet needs (TRIBUNE) in multiple sclerosis: the costs and utilities of MS patients in Canada.
201262
6 200852
7 201748
8 201844
9 202143
10 201743
11 201641
12 201240
13 201237
14 201835
15 201034
16 201132
17 202027
18 202225
19 201221
20 201416

About Daniel Selchen

Daniel Selchen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology, Physiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (20 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (7 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (520 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (124 citations), Neurology (232 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (33 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (32 citations). Daniel Selchen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gustavo Saposnik, Mark S. Freedman, Qiyun Shi, Roseanna Presutti, Alexandre Prat, Yves Lapierre, Michael Yeung, Douglas L. Arnold, Brenda Banwell and François Grand’Maison. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Neurology, Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders and Multiple Sclerosis Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact