Daniel S. Renner

546 citations
65 papers · 430 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel S. Renner

60 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Daniel S. Renner
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 235
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 371
  • Instrumentation 20
  • Spectroscopy 37
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 9
Replace Ralf Hülsewede with:
Ralf Hülsewede Germany
Douglas L. Franzen United States
K. Ogawa United States
Paul Sotirelis United States
Jon C. Geske United States
Stefan Klaus Hoeffgen Germany
Jean-Francois Seurin United States
S. Weisser Germany
Tze-An Liu Taiwan
S.R. Borrello United States
Daniel S. Renner relative to Ralf Hülsewede Germany Ralf Hülsewede's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Ralf Hülsewede · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Renner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Renner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Renner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Renner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Renner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Renner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Renner. The network helps show where Daniel S. Renner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel S. Renner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel S. Renner Line = papers co-authored together Daniel S. Renner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987113
2 198919
3 199017
4 198716
5 199214
6 196513
7 198712
8 199112
9 197811
10 198710
11 199110
12 19919
13 19799
14 19869
15 19818
16 20228
17 19638
18 20178
19 19888
20 20217

About Daniel S. Renner

Daniel S. Renner is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Spectroscopy and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 65 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (46 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (31 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (22 papers), Optical Network Technologies (14 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (12 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (9 papers), Laser Design and Applications (6 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (235 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (371 citations), Instrumentation (20 citations), Spectroscopy (37 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (9 citations). Daniel S. Renner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wood-Hi Cheng, Ami Appelbaum, J.E. Carroll, C. B. Su, K. L. Hess, Dietlinde Wolf, Paul O. Leisher, G.D. Henshall, Jay L. Ankeney and Shuan-Yu Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Electronics Letters, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics and IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact