Daniel R. Moore

593 citations
8 papers · 384 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel R. Moore

8 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers

Daniel R. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 85
  • Computational Mechanics 138
  • Computer Networks and Communications 152
  • Condensed Matter Physics 46
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 60
Replace F. H. Busse with:
F. H. Busse United States
F. Feudel Germany
Olga Podvigina Russia
A. C. Or United States
А. В. Гетлинг Russia
Brendan B. Plapp United States
Oriol Batiste Spain
Alessio Turchi Italy
Takashi Sakajo Japan
P. Lucas United Kingdom
Daniel R. Moore relative to F. H. Busse United States F. H. Busse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
F. H. Busse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Moore. The network helps show where Daniel R. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Daniel R. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel R. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Daniel R. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown

About Daniel R. Moore

Daniel R. Moore is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Mechanics, Numerical Analysis, Condensed Matter Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Theoretical and Computational Physics (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (85 citations), Computational Mechanics (138 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (152 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (46 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (60 citations). Daniel R. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Herbert E. Huppert, Edgar Knobloch, N. O. Weiss, Juri Toomre, Nicholas Hale, Alan J. Wallcraft, Silvia Zane, T. S. Horbury, A. N. Fazakerley and D. O. Kataria. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, Parallel Computing, The Astrophysical Journal and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact