Daniel Newcombe

10 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Daniel Newcombe
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 196
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 99
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 242
  • Social Psychology 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 38
Replace Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós with:
Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós Spain
Fabian W. Otte Germany
Philip E. Kearney Ireland
Felippe Cardoso Brazil
Emanuela Pierantozzi Italy
Adela Bădău Romania
Sarah‐Kate Millar New Zealand
Fiona Iredale Australia
João Carvalho Portugal
Andréa Michele Freudenheim Brazil
Daniel Newcombe relative to Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós Spain Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexandra Pérez-Ferreirós · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Newcombe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Newcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Newcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Newcombe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Newcombe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Newcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Newcombe. The network helps show where Daniel Newcombe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Newcombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Newcombe Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Newcombe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2019107
2 201969
3 201855
4 201339
5
A department of methodology can coordinate transdisciplinary sport science support
202033
6 202128
7 201426
8 201926
9 201112
10 20195

About Daniel Newcombe

Daniel Newcombe is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Social Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 10 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (5 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (4 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (3 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Sports and Physical Education Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1 paper), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (1 paper) and Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (196 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (99 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (242 citations), Social Psychology (77 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (38 citations). Daniel Newcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Keith Davids, Will Roberts, Ian Renshaw, Michael G. Hughes, Keeron Stone, Duarte Araújo, Jon L. Oliver, Robert W. Meyers, Rick Shuttleworth and James Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching and European Journal of Sport Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact