Daniel McDermott

45 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Sensory Systems 340
  • Speech and Hearing 183
  • Neurology 204
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 303
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 348
Replace Josef G. Heckmann with:
Josef G. Heckmann Germany
Michael H Bennett Australia
Vincent Couloigner France
Anna H. Messner United States
David W. Roberson United States
Nader Saki Iran
Dwight T. Jones United States
Naresh K. Panda India
M. Tayyar Kalcıoğlu Türkiye
Martin J Burton United Kingdom
Daniel McDermott relative to Josef G. Heckmann Germany Josef G. Heckmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Josef G. Heckmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel McDermott. The network helps show where Daniel McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Daniel McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998199
2 2006181
3 2012115
4 2008100
5 1999100
6 201298
7 199193
8 200981
9
Validation of the Social Security Death Index (SSDI): An Important Readily-Available Outcomes Database for Researchers.
200876
10 201473
11 200565
12 201260
13
Validation of the Social Security Death Index (SSDI): An Important Readily-Available Outcomes Database for Researchers
200853
14 200648
15 198446
16 200941
17 200741
18 200033
19 197729
20 201122

About Daniel McDermott

Daniel McDermott is a scholar working on Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (8 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (340 citations), Speech and Hearing (183 citations), Neurology (204 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (303 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (348 citations). Daniel McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James Quinn, Stephen A. Fausti, Susan Griest, George A. Wells, Michael A. Kohn, Richard L. Miller, Ian G. Stiell, Michael Smith, István Arany and Herbert B. Slade. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Spine, Academic Emergency Medicine and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact