Daniel McDermott

45 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daniel McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Sensory Systems 292
  • Speech and Hearing 107
  • Neurology 134
  • Emergency Medical Services 90
  • Surgery 501
Replace Vincent Couloigner with:
Vincent Couloigner France
Kedar K. Adour United States
Te‐Huei Yeh Taiwan
David W. Roberson United States
Karen H. Calhoun United States
Dwight T. Jones United States
Naresh K. Panda India
Claudia Rudack Germany
Orhan Özturan Türkiye
Patrick Dawes New Zealand
Daniel McDermott relative to Vincent Couloigner France Vincent Couloigner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Vincent Couloigner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel McDermott. The network helps show where Daniel McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel McDermott Line = papers co-authored together Daniel McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998207
2 2006184
3 2012125
4 1999106
5 2008104
6 2012102
7 199196
8 200982
9
Validation of the Social Security Death Index (SSDI): An Important Readily-Available Outcomes Database for Researchers.
200877
10 201477
11 200569
12 201262
13 198457
14
Validation of the Social Security Death Index (SSDI): An Important Readily-Available Outcomes Database for Researchers
200854
15 200650
16 200745
17 200941
18 200033
19 197729
20 198526

About Daniel McDermott

Daniel McDermott is a scholar working on Surgery, Sensory Systems, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cancer Research, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (7 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (292 citations), Speech and Hearing (107 citations), Neurology (134 citations), Emergency Medical Services (90 citations) and Surgery (501 citations). Daniel McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Quinn, Stephen A. Fausti, Susan Griest, George A. Wells, Herbert B. Slade, Michael Smith, István Arany, Ian G. Stiell, Michael A. Kohn and Richard L. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Spine, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development and Academic Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact