Daniel Marcus
Impact in
-
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
- International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Political Conflict and Governance
- Disaster Management and Resilience
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Papers in
-
- Media Studies and Communication 2
- Social Media and Politics 1
-
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 1
- World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact 1
- Co-authors
- Philip Zelikow (1 shared paper)Lee Hamilton (1 shared paper)James R. Thompson (1 shared paper)Slade Gorton (1 shared paper)Thomas H. Kean (1 shared paper)Timothy John Roemer (1 shared paper)Laura Stein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television (2 papers)Missouri law review (1 paper)Peace Review (1 paper)Rutgers University Press eBooks (1 paper)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Marcus
4 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Political Science and International Relations 94
- Sociology and Political Science 165
- Chemical Health and Safety 2
- Communication 19
- Public Administration 8
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Marcus
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Marcus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Marcus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Marcus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Marcus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Marcus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Marcus. The network helps show where Daniel Marcus may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Marcus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The 9/11 Commission Report | 2004 | 307 |
| 2 | ADR and the Federal Government: Not Such Strange Bedfellows after All | 2001 | 4 |
| 3 | "Inventing Abstraction, 1910-1925". | 2013 | 4 |
| 4 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 0 |
About Daniel Marcus
Daniel Marcus is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, History and Accounting, having authored 7 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (1 paper), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (1 paper), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Business Law and Ethics (1 paper) and Cinema and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (94 citations), Sociology and Political Science (165 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (2 citations), Communication (19 citations) and Public Administration (8 citations). Daniel Marcus has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Zelikow, Lee Hamilton, James R. Thompson, Slade Gorton, Thomas H. Kean, Timothy John Roemer and Laura Stein. Their work appears in journals such as Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television, Missouri law review, Peace Review, Rutgers University Press eBooks and Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.