Daniel Loew

7 papers receiving 356 citations

Daniel Loew's Hit Papers

The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe. 2016 · 271 citations
2710+3+6Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Daniel Loew
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 198
  • Demography 70
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Gender Studies 50
  • Health 30
Replace Jonathan Daniel Freedman with:
Jonathan Daniel Freedman United Kingdom
Cassandra Alexopoulos United States
Susan Anne Fox United States
Sara M. Grady United States
Caroline Bell United Kingdom
Michael R. Langlais United States
Grace N. Rivera United States
Rongmao Lin China
Jennifer Eck Germany
Stephen M. Yoshimura United States
Daniel Loew relative to Jonathan Daniel Freedman United Kingdom Jonathan Daniel Freedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.6×
Jonathan Daniel Freedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Loew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Loew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Loew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Loew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Loew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Loew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Loew. The network helps show where Daniel Loew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Loew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Loew Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Loew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe.
Hit paper breakdown →
2016271
2 201777
3 20029
4
Acute renal failure in experimental shock due to scalding.
19766
5
[RESEARCH ON THE AMINE POTENTIATING EFFECT OF ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS IN RABBITS].
19643
6 19841
7 20081
8 20170

About Daniel Loew

Daniel Loew is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Complementary and alternative medicine, Neurology, Ophthalmology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (1 paper), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper), Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (198 citations), Demography (70 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Gender Studies (50 citations) and Health (30 citations). Daniel Loew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Galen D. McNeil, Amie M. Gordon, Dacher J. Keltner, Craig L. Anderson, Jennifer E. Stellar, Melba A. Hernández-Tejada, Ron E. Acierno, Georgia J. Anetzberger, Wendy A. Muzzy and Max Taeschler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, Pharmacopsychiatry, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift and Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact