Daniel Lin

2.7k citations
23 papers · 1.9k · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Lin

23 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Daniel Lin's Hit Papers

The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others 2002 · 845 citations
8450+8+16Years since publication250500750

Peers

Daniel Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • General Decision Sciences 153
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 719
  • Family Practice 37
  • Applied Psychology 88
  • Clinical Psychology 307
Replace Eva Traut‐Mattausch with:
Eva Traut‐Mattausch Austria
Julia Steinmetz Germany
Jan K. Woike Germany
Allan R. Harkness United States
Goran Knežević Serbia
Adam J. L. Harris United Kingdom
Daniel Martin United States
Kalman J. Kaplan United States
P. Alex Mabe United States
Andrew Cooper United Kingdom
Daniel Lin relative to Eva Traut‐Mattausch Austria Eva Traut‐Mattausch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Eva Traut‐Mattausch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Lin. The network helps show where Daniel Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Lin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others
Hit paper breakdown →
2002845
2 2007199
3 2009163
4 2008100
5 200885
6 200675
7 200664
8 200753
9 201151
10 200644
11 200943
12 200634
13 199819
14 201418
15 200715
16 201213
17 201911
18 20077
19 19987
20 20086

About Daniel Lin

Daniel Lin is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Biological Psychiatry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (5 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (1 paper), Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (153 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (719 citations), Family Practice (37 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations) and Clinical Psychology (307 citations). Daniel Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Emily Pronin, Lee Ross, Mauricio Tohen, Holland C. Detke, David McDonnell, Lakshmi N. Yatham, Gopalan Sethuraman, S. Corya, Wen Xu and John M. Kane. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, European Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact