Daniel L. Pals

592 citations
18 papers · 312 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Cultural and Religious Practices in Indonesia
    • Cultural and Artistic Studies
    • Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education

Papers in

Daniel L. Pals

16 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Daniel L. Pals
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Cultural Studies 86
  • Religious studies 46
  • Philosophy 65
  • Health 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 212
Replace Michael Pye with:
Michael Pye Germany
Jason Ânanda Josephson Storm United States
Philip Yampolsky United States
Kevin Schilbrack United States
Carole M. Cusack Australia
Amy Hollywood United States
Santiago Zabala Spain
Klaus K. Klostermaier Canada
Winston L. King United States
Anna Strhan United Kingdom
Daniel L. Pals relative to Michael Pye Germany Michael Pye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Pye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Pals

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Pals's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Pals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Pals more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Pals

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Pals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Pals. The network helps show where Daniel L. Pals may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Pals, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Pals Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Pals links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199778
2
Eight theories of religion
200656
3 199739
4 198731
5
Nine Theories of Religion
201424
6 199718
7 199816
8
Seven Theories of Religion : Tujuh Teori Agama Paling Komprehensif
201112
9 198612
10 19838
11
Introducing Religion: Readings from the Classic Theorists
20087
12 20074
13 19903
14 19902
15 19751
16 19891
17 19920
18 19890

About Daniel L. Pals

Daniel L. Pals is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, History and Religious studies, having authored 18 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (86 citations), Religious studies (46 citations), Philosophy (65 citations), Health (43 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (212 citations). Daniel L. Pals has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen D. Glazier, Horton Davies, Robert A. Segal, Frederick Mathewson Denny, Ivan Strenski, Robert A. Voeks, Ninian Smart, Jaroslav Pelikán, Robert T. Handy and James Hennesey. Their work appears in journals such as Church History, Religion, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Review of Religious Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact