Daniel König

30 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Daniel König
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 24
  • Clinical Psychology 71
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 37
  • Biological Psychiatry 5
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 6
Replace Giuseppina Trincas with:
Giuseppina Trincas Italy
Kürşat Altınbaş Türkiye
Areti C. Spyropoulou Greece
Олег Чабан Ukraine
Murat Gülsün Türkiye
Leyla Gülseren Türkiye
Katrin Skala Austria
Sabrina Islamoska Denmark
Osman Kurt Türkiye
Daniel König relative to Giuseppina Trincas Italy Giuseppina Trincas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Giuseppina Trincas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel König

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel König's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel König with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel König more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel König

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel König. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel König. The network helps show where Daniel König may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel König, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel König Line = papers co-authored together Daniel König links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201823
2 202021
3 202119
4 202119
5 201916
6 202016
7 202015
8 201814
9 202214
10 201813
11 202512
12 202011
13 202310
14 202010
15 20198
16 20227
17 20186
18 20206
19 20176
20 20206

About Daniel König

Daniel König is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Epidemiology and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (71 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (37 citations), Biological Psychiatry (5 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (6 citations). Daniel König has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Vyssoki, Barbara Hinterbuchinger, Thomas Waldhoer, Josef Baumgärtner, Lukas L. Negrin, Thomas Waldhör, Nestor D. Kapusta, Petr Winkler, Simon Hametner and Karolína Mladá. Their work appears in journals such as European Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Alcohol and Alcoholism, Alcohol and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact