Daniel K. Reasoner
Impact in
-
- Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Neurology top 10%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Papers in
- Surgery 5
- Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy 2
- Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring 2
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 5
- Co-authors
- David S. Warner (5 shared papers)Franklin Dexter (4 shared papers)Michael M. Todd (3 shared papers)John R. Moyers (2 shared papers)Javier H. Campos (2 shared papers)Bradley J. Hindman (5 shared papers)Franklin L. Scamman (1 shared paper)Michael M. Todd (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (4 papers)Anesthesiology (3 papers)Stroke (2 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Daniel K. Reasoner
12 papers receiving 451 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 176
- Neurology 148
- Developmental Neuroscience 30
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 193
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 28
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Reasoner
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Reasoner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Reasoner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Reasoner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Reasoner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Reasoner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Reasoner. The network helps show where Daniel K. Reasoner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel K. Reasoner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 110 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 56 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 46 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 44 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 1 |
About Daniel K. Reasoner
Daniel K. Reasoner is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Blood transfusion and management (2 papers) and Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (176 citations), Neurology (148 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (30 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (193 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (28 citations). Daniel K. Reasoner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David S. Warner, Franklin Dexter, Michael M. Todd, John R. Moyers, Javier H. Campos, Bradley J. Hindman, Franklin L. Scamman, Michael M. Todd, Johann Cutkomp and Thomas J. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Stroke, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.