Daniel K. Miles

1.5k citations
33 papers · 952 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel K. Miles

31 papers receiving 907 citations

Peers

Daniel K. Miles
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Physiology 457
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 230
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 106
  • Neurology 67
Replace André B. Rietman with:
André B. Rietman Netherlands
Raymond S. Kandt United States
Takao Enomoto Japan
Jessica Sun United States
Roy D. Elterman United States
Leone Giordano Italy
Debora Kidron Israel
Jean‐Michel Pédespan France
John C. McHugh Ireland
W. B. Woodhurst Canada
Daniel K. Miles relative to André B. Rietman Netherlands André B. Rietman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
André B. Rietman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel K. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel K. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel K. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel K. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel K. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel K. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel K. Miles. The network helps show where Daniel K. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel K. Miles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel K. Miles Line = papers co-authored together Daniel K. Miles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011168
2 2006142
3 200791
4 200449
5 200647
6 199046
7 201842
8 201840
9 201131
10 199529
11 200428
12 200427
13 200021
14 201321
15 200521
16 202120
17 201920
18 200019
19 200318
20 200914

About Daniel K. Miles

Daniel K. Miles is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (11 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (11 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (5 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (4 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (457 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (230 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (126 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations) and Neurology (67 citations). Daniel K. Miles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Orrin Devinsky, Josiane LaJoie, Charles M. Zaroff, Howard L. Weiner, Chad Carlson, Agustín Legido, Gregory L. Holmes, Emily B. Ridgway, Warren D. Grover and Catherine M. Foley. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Neurology, Journal of Child Neurology, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, Epilepsia and Epileptic Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact