Daniel Jones

15 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Daniel Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Human-Computer Interaction 127
  • Occupational Therapy 35
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
  • Rehabilitation 15
Replace Satinder Gill with:
Satinder Gill United States
Antoine Muller France
Sonya Allin Canada
Karen Glass Canada
Charles Woolley United States
Peter K. Larsen Denmark
Julianna Arva United States
Merkur Alimusaj Germany
M. Pompeo United States
Éric Desailly France
Daniel Jones relative to Satinder Gill United States Satinder Gill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Satinder Gill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Jones. The network helps show where Daniel Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Jones Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200069
2 200263
3 200054
4 200046
5 202225
6 199820
7 19919
8
Complications of acquired diverticula of the ileum.
19839
9 20087
10 20027
11 19826
12 20234
13 20223
14
Accuracy of intraoperative staging in colorectal cancer.
19942
15 19751

About Daniel Jones

Daniel Jones is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Occupational Therapy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (4 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (1 paper), Diverticular Disease and Complications (1 paper), Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (1 paper) and Ureteral procedures and complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (127 citations), Occupational Therapy (35 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations) and Rehabilitation (15 citations). Daniel Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Rory A. Cooper, Michael L. Boninger, Robert V. Rege, David R. Rutledge, Shirley G. Fitzgerald, Stephanie Fitzgerald, Songfeng Guo, Donald M. Spaeth, R.N. Robertson and Lana M. Widman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Icarus, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, The American Journal of Surgery and Symmetry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact