Daniel J. Young

19 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Development 124
  • Political Science and International Relations 174
  • Sociology and Political Science 297
  • Law 51
  • Analytical Chemistry 41
Replace Adam S. Harris with:
Adam S. Harris United States
Nicole Ball United Kingdom
Sachin Chaturvedi India
Jappe Eckhardt United Kingdom
Yunus Kaya United States
Nadia Molenaers Belgium
Ann‐Sofie Isaksson Sweden
Joshua Greenstein United States
Ryan C. Briggs United States
Morten Broberg Denmark
Daniel J. Young relative to Adam S. Harris United States Adam S. Harris's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Adam S. Harris · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Young. The network helps show where Daniel J. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Young Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007251
2 2014124
3 200851
4 201838
5 201234
6 201227
7 201520
8 198214
9 200912
10 201510
11 20159
12 20197
13 20154
14 20203
15 20223
16
The Debate on "Sequencing"
20073
17 20222
18 20212
19
Social Factors Affecting Violent Crime in the State of North Carolina
20191
20 20240

About Daniel J. Young

Daniel J. Young is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Gender Studies, having authored 23 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers), Media Influence and Politics (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers), Economic Growth and Development (2 papers) and Trace Elements in Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (124 citations), Political Science and International Relations (174 citations), Sociology and Political Science (297 citations), Law (51 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (41 citations). Daniel J. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Posner, James M. Harrington, Keith E. Levine, Amal S. Essader, Nathan M. Jensen, Peter VonDoepp, Diane S. Bushee, Richard Savage, Scott Smith and Ira S. Krull. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Trace Element Research, Talanta, Electoral Studies, Journal of democracy and Journal of Experimental Political Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact