Daniel J. Robison

1.4k citations
48 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Robison

47 papers receiving 966 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Robison
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 240
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 278
  • Insect Science 235
  • Global and Planetary Change 298
  • Ecology 305
Replace Francine M. Tremblay with:
Francine M. Tremblay Canada
Glen R. Stanosz United States
Bruno Vila France
Catherine Bastien France
Don E. Riemenschneider United States
Jos Van Slycken Belgium
Anneli Viherä‐Aarnio Finland
Dudley A. Huber United States
Pirkko Velling Finland
Neil D. Nelson United States
Daniel J. Robison relative to Francine M. Tremblay Canada Francine M. Tremblay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Francine M. Tremblay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Robison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Robison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Robison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Robison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Robison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Robison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Robison. The network helps show where Daniel J. Robison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Robison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Robison Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Robison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991179
2 2003160
3 199866
4 200551
5 199447
6 199742
7 200839
8 199437
9 199834
10 200533
11 200128
12 200328
13 199028
14 201227
15 200924
16 200418
17 200016
18 201016
19 200415
20 200614

About Daniel J. Robison

Daniel J. Robison is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Ecology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (19 papers), Forest Management and Policy (14 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (10 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (8 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (240 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (278 citations), Insect Science (235 citations), Global and Planetary Change (298 citations) and Ecology (305 citations). Daniel J. Robison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth F. Raffa, Scott X. Chang, Lawrence P. Abrahamson, Brent H. McCown, Dennis E. McCabe, D.R. Russell, Kenneth A. Barton, Timothy A. Volk, Jamie L. Schuler and Edwin H. White. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, New Forests, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Biomass and Bioenergy and Forest Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact