Daniel Hoyer

740 citations
22 papers · 194 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hoyer

19 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Daniel Hoyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Paleontology 27
  • Cultural Studies 18
  • Anthropology 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 91
  • Demography 19
Replace A. G. R. Smith with:
A. G. R. Smith United Kingdom
Dmitri M. Bondarenko Russia
Edward Turner United Kingdom
Regina Ganter Australia
William Wayne Farris United States
Sin Autor Spain
Wolfgang Behringer Germany
Judy Ledgerwood United States
David Hanlon United States
William Ellis South Africa
Daniel Hoyer relative to A. G. R. Smith United Kingdom A. G. R. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
A. G. R. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hoyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hoyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hoyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hoyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hoyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hoyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hoyer. The network helps show where Daniel Hoyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hoyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hoyer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hoyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202340
2 202223
3 201821
4 201516
5 202314
6 201814
7 202113
8 202212
9 20238
10 20216
11 20215
12 20205
13 20194
14 20244
15 20183
16 20252
17 20182
18 20231
19 20081
20 20250

About Daniel Hoyer

Daniel Hoyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Paleontology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (4 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (2 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (27 citations), Cultural Studies (18 citations), Anthropology (20 citations), Sociology and Political Science (91 citations) and Demography (19 citations). Daniel Hoyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Turchin, Harvey Whitehouse, Pieter François, Jenny Reddish, Jill Levine, Kevin Feeney, Gary M. Feinman, Robert Howard, Francis Ludlow and Patrick E. Savage. Their work appears in journals such as Global Sustainability, PLoS ONE, Social Science History, Scientific Reports and Journal of world history.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact