Daniel Hook

501 citations
34 papers · 385 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hook

30 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Daniel Hook
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 80
  • Software 32
  • Information Systems and Management 43
  • Bioengineering 25
  • Computer Networks and Communications 70
Replace Martin Uhrin with:
Martin Uhrin Switzerland
Pieter Wuytens Belgium
Marta Skreta Canada
Philipp K. Janert United States
K. Sieber United States
Paul Stephenson United Kingdom
Max C. Gallant United States
Bernardus Rendy United States
Dhruv Shah United States
Daniel Hook relative to Martin Uhrin Switzerland Martin Uhrin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Martin Uhrin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hook. The network helps show where Daniel Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hook Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199262
2 199153
3 200047
4 200934
5 201727
6 199825
7 201017
8 199114
9 200914
10 199112
11 200411
12 201510
13 20169
14 20098
15 20066
16 20086
17
Using Code Mutation to Study Code Faults in Scientific Software
20095
18 20214
19 20074
20 20102

About Daniel Hook

Daniel Hook is a scholar working on Information Systems, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Information Systems and Management, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (4 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surfaces, Coatings and Films (80 citations), Software (32 citations), Information Systems and Management (43 citations), Bioengineering (25 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (70 citations). Daniel Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Diane Kelly, Joseph A. Gardella, Terrence G. Vargo, Frank V. Bright, Kevin Litwiler, Patrick Aebischer, Patrick M. Thompson, Robert F. Valentini, L. J. Gerenser and Katarzyna Wyglądacz. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Langmuir, Computing in Science & Engineering, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films and Applied Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact