Daniel Hepenstrick

475 citations
13 papers · 76 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Hepenstrick

10 papers receiving 72 citations

Peers

Daniel Hepenstrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Ecology 37
  • Ecological Modeling 6
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 27
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 12
  • Geology 4
Replace Agathe Hurel with:
Agathe Hurel France
Ana González‐Robles Spain
Moritz Blumer Germany
Joana L. Rocha United States
Mira Garner United States
Bart De Cuyper Belgium
William Swainson
José Aguilar‐Cano Colombia
Johannes Bail United States
Nicolas Debortoli Belgium
Daniel Hepenstrick relative to Agathe Hurel France Agathe Hurel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Agathe Hurel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Hepenstrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Hepenstrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Hepenstrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Hepenstrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Hepenstrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Hepenstrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Hepenstrick. The network helps show where Daniel Hepenstrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Hepenstrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Hepenstrick Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Hepenstrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201237
2 201914
3 202010
4 20214
5 20143
6 20212
7 20162
8 20231
9 20121
10 20181
11 20121
12 20180
13 20200

About Daniel Hepenstrick

Daniel Hepenstrick is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (8 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (3 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers) and Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (37 citations), Ecological Modeling (6 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (27 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (12 citations) and Geology (4 citations). Daniel Hepenstrick has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Rolf Holderegger, Dominik Thiel, Félix Gugerli, Ariel Bergamini, Iwona Dembicz, Steffen Boch, Alex Widmer, Clare Webster, Christian Ginzler and Jürgen Dengler. Their work appears in journals such as Hacquetia, Conservation Genetics, Ecology and Evolution, Basic and Applied Ecology and Journal of Vegetation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact