Daniel Epstein

1.3k citations
26 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Epstein

26 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Daniel Epstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 873
  • Ophthalmology 217
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 109
  • Epidemiology 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 29
Replace Mary Anne Edwards with:
Mary Anne Edwards United States
Haisi Chen China
Akbar Derakhshan Iran
Rakhee Shah United Kingdom
Kovin S. Naidoo South Africa
Dharani Ramamurthy Singapore
Sven Jonuscheit United Kingdom
Sin Wan Cheung Hong Kong
Saulius R. Varnas Australia
Mario Cantó-Cerdán Spain
Daniel Epstein relative to Mary Anne Edwards United States Mary Anne Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.5×
Mary Anne Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Epstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Epstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Epstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Epstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Epstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Epstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Epstein. The network helps show where Daniel Epstein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Epstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Epstein Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Epstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011185
2 2012176
3 1993172
4 1994141
5 199764
6 199442
7 199439
8 199136
9 201029
10 198128
11 200717
12 200717
13 200716
14 199613
15 201212
16 199411
17 201511
18 198310
19 19988
20 19936

About Daniel Epstein

Daniel Epstein is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal surgery and disorders (17 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (873 citations), Ophthalmology (217 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (109 citations), Epidemiology (116 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations). Daniel Epstein has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Per Fagerholm, Heléne Hamberg‐Nyström, Björn Tengroth, Elena Albè, Paolo Vinciguerra, Silvia Trazza, Béatrice E. Frueh, Thomas D. Fitzsimmons, Michael J. Rudolph and Kathrin Laaser. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmology, Journal of Refractive Surgery, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Cornea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact