Daniel E. Rio

24 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Rio
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 68
  • Biological Psychiatry 32
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 244
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 166
  • Neurology 98
Replace Peter Mondrup Rasmussen with:
Peter Mondrup Rasmussen Denmark
Camellia P. Clark United States
Melanie Ganz Denmark
Cornelius Hojatkashani United States
Martin Weygandt Germany
Scott Greenwald United States
Benjamin Thyreau Japan
Chun Meng China
Jian Liao China
Suh Lee United States
Daniel E. Rio relative to Peter Mondrup Rasmussen Denmark Peter Mondrup Rasmussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Peter Mondrup Rasmussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Rio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Rio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Rio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Rio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Rio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Rio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Rio. The network helps show where Daniel E. Rio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Rio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Rio Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Rio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014138
2 1998124
3 1999122
4 197972
5 199769
6 199246
7 199443
8 199539
9 199734
10 199626
11 199317
12 199312
13 19869
14 19887
15 19905
16 20064
17 20224
18 20024
19 19803
20 20003

About Daniel E. Rio

Daniel E. Rio is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Neurology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 27 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (4 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (3 papers) and Neurological and metabolic disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (68 citations), Biological Psychiatry (32 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (244 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (166 citations) and Neurology (98 citations). Daniel E. Rio has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Urs E. Ruttimann, Daniel W. Hommer, Robert R. Rawlings, Paul Andreason, Reza Momenan, Michael J. Eckardt, Karen Sirocco, Michaël Unser, Wendy J. Lombardi and John C. Umhau. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and NeuroImage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact