Daniel E. Clark

1k citations
57 papers · 735 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Clark

47 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 259
  • Infectious Diseases 113
  • Epidemiology 162
  • Neurology 70
  • Surgery 165
Replace Michael P. DiLorenzo with:
Michael P. DiLorenzo United States
Amee M. Shah United States
Ferran Gran y Spain
Vineeta Ojha India
Matthias Lachaud France
Amar B. Shah United States
Jason P. Womack United States
Fabio Sciutti Italy
Alberto Rigatelli Italy
Madhusudan Ganigara United States
Daniel E. Clark relative to Michael P. DiLorenzo United States Michael P. DiLorenzo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Michael P. DiLorenzo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Clark. The network helps show where Daniel E. Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Clark Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Clark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020170
2 202154
3 201746
4 202344
5 202337
6 202136
7 202032
8 202328
9 202226
10 202224
11 201623
12 201823
13 202320
14 202216
15 201915
16 202010
17 202110
18 202210
19 202410
20 20219

About Daniel E. Clark

Daniel E. Clark is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Parasitology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (15 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (7 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (5 papers), Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications (5 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (4 papers) and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (259 citations), Infectious Diseases (113 citations), Epidemiology (162 citations), Neurology (70 citations) and Surgery (165 citations). Daniel E. Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Dendy, Jonathan H. Soslow, Sean G. Hughes, Amar Parikh, Kristen George‐Durrett, Kara J. Denby, James C. Slaughter, Larry Wayne Markham, Alex Benjamin Diamond and Frank A. Fish. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Journal of the American Heart Association, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, PLoS neglected tropical diseases and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact