Daniel E. Challis

1.1k citations
33 papers · 835 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Challis

31 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Challis
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 197
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 197
  • Cancer Research 96
  • Genetics 138
  • Molecular Biology 266
Replace Friederike Herr with:
Friederike Herr Germany
Sophie Perrier d'HAUTERIVE Belgium
Martha Carranza Salas United States
Gerry H. Faessen United States
Guanglan Guo Australia
Annie Levy‐Mozziconacci France
Nobuhiko Suganuma Japan
Sarah C Hsu United States
Tomoko Saito‐Fujita Japan
Cihangir Mutlu Ercan Türkiye
Daniel E. Challis relative to Friederike Herr Germany Friederike Herr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Friederike Herr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Challis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Challis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Challis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Challis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Challis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Challis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Challis. The network helps show where Daniel E. Challis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Challis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Challis Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Challis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013289
2 201378
3 200871
4 199959
5 200048
6 201231
7 201030
8 200727
9 201524
10 202019
11 201417
12 201216
13 199912
14 199512
15 20109
16 20129
17 20199
18 19968
19 20168
20 20198

About Daniel E. Challis

Daniel E. Challis is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Hematology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 33 papers that have together received 835 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (6 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (197 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (197 citations), Cancer Research (96 citations), Genetics (138 citations) and Molecular Biology (266 citations). Daniel E. Challis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alec William Welsh, Jan A. Deprest, Eduard Gratacós, Sally Tracy, Lisa Hui, Amanda Henry, Neama Meriki, Christiane D. Pfarrer, Gideon Koren and S. Lee Adamson. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Acta Paediatrica, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact