Daniel Drew

1.6k citations
42 papers · 937 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Drew

40 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

Daniel Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 255
  • Human-Computer Interaction 73
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Neurology 109
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
Replace Adrienne Wood with:
Adrienne Wood United States
Tim Genewein Germany
Alessandra Sciutti Italy
Bi Zhu China
Jing Fan China
Tara Julia Hamilton Australia
Mike Cohen United States
Arnold J.W.M. Thomassen Netherlands
Francisco Pereira United States
Mark Sagar New Zealand
Daniel Drew relative to Adrienne Wood United States Adrienne Wood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Adrienne Wood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Drew. The network helps show where Daniel Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Drew Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202197
2 202163
3 201659
4 202153
5 201853
6 201752
7 202049
8 201741
9 202139
10 202039
11 201733
12 201830
13 201727
14 202027
15 202126
16 201724
17 201823
18 201722
19 201821
20 202119

About Daniel Drew

Daniel Drew is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (7 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (6 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence (4 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (3 papers) and Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (255 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (73 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Neurology (109 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations). Daniel Drew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Masud Husain, Kristofer S. J. Pister, Sanjay Manohar, Patricia Lockwood, Ayat Abdurahman, Sean Follmer, Björn Hartmann, David A. Mellis, Kinan Muhammed and Nathan Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Cortex, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Psychological Science and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact