Daniel Day

1.1k citations
37 papers · 813 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Day

35 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

Daniel Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Biomedical Engineering 541
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 182
  • Biophysics 56
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 248
  • Computational Mechanics 133
Replace Krishna Chaitanya Vishnubhatla with:
Krishna Chaitanya Vishnubhatla Italy
U. Hinze Germany
R. Rangel-Rojo Mexico
G. Beadie United States
Ali Hatef Canada
Sergiy Patskovsky Canada
Jonathan B. Ashcom United States
Krishnan Sathiyamoorthy Canada
Yaoran Liu United States
Eric D. Diebold United States
Daniel Day relative to Krishna Chaitanya Vishnubhatla Italy Krishna Chaitanya Vishnubhatla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Krishna Chaitanya Vishnubhatla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Day. The network helps show where Daniel Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Day Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008154
2 199984
3 200975
4 200271
5 199861
6 200159
7 200554
8 199946
9 200840
10 200835
11 201116
12 200216
13 201213
14 20129
15 20109
16 20139
17 20068
18 20067
19 20106
20 20105

About Daniel Day

Daniel Day is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Ophthalmology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (11 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (9 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (8 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (7 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (6 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (5 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (5 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (541 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (182 citations), Biophysics (56 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (248 citations) and Computational Mechanics (133 citations). Daniel Day has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Miṅ Gu, Jingliang Li, Andrew J. Smallridge, Min Gu, Jing Wu, Jörg Baumgartl, Kishan Dholakia, David J. Stevenson, Saulius Juodkazis and Gediminas Gervinskas. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Applied Physics Letters, Optics and Lasers in Engineering and Lab on a Chip.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact