Daniel Day

1.1k citations
39 papers · 882 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Day

36 papers receiving 832 citations

Peers

Daniel Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Biomedical Engineering 364
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 269
  • Computational Mechanics 150
  • Biophysics 44
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 102
Replace Hidekazu Ishitobi with:
Hidekazu Ishitobi Japan
Ulrich Ch. Fischer Germany
Klony S. Lieberman Israel
Andrew Stannard United Kingdom
Patrick J. Moyer United States
Arnaud Royon France
Óscar G. Calderón Spain
Valeria Lotito Switzerland
Kinjal Dasbiswas United States
Iva Z. Maxwell United States
Daniel Day relative to Hidekazu Ishitobi Japan Hidekazu Ishitobi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hidekazu Ishitobi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Day. The network helps show where Daniel Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Day Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008158
2 199992
3 200982
4 200273
5 199872
6 200166
7 200560
8 199950
9 200840
10 200838
11 200220
12 201118
13 201214
14 201211
15 20069
16 20109
17 20139
18 20068
19 20016
20
Femtosecond Biophotonics: Core Technology and Applications
20106

About Daniel Day

Daniel Day is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics, Computational Mechanics and Cell Biology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (11 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (10 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (6 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (6 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (4 papers) and Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (364 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (269 citations), Computational Mechanics (150 citations), Biophysics (44 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (102 citations). Daniel Day has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Miṅ Gu, Jingliang Li, Andrew J. Smallridge, Min Gu, Jing Wu, Jörg Baumgartl, Saulius Juodkazis, David J. Stevenson, Kishan Dholakia and Min Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Lab on a Chip, Advanced Materials and Applied Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact