Daniel D. Heath

3.8k citations
99 papers · 2.9k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel D. Heath

96 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Daniel D. Heath
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.8k
  • Aquatic Science 880
  • Physiology 436
  • Ecology 980
  • Genetics 997
Replace Sissel Jentoft with:
Sissel Jentoft Norway
Maria M. Coelho Portugal
Sofía Consuegra United Kingdom
Kenji Saitoh Japan
Roy G. Danzmann Canada
René Guyomard France
Bernie May United States
Pierre‐Alexandre Gagnaire France
Martin I. Taylor United Kingdom
Ruth E. Withler Canada
Daniel D. Heath relative to Sissel Jentoft Norway Sissel Jentoft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sissel Jentoft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Heath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Heath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Heath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Heath. The network helps show where Daniel D. Heath may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel D. Heath, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel D. Heath Line = papers co-authored together Daniel D. Heath links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003254
2 1999230
3 2000178
4 2003100
5 199496
6 199992
7 201189
8 200882
9 199881
10 201072
11 200571
12 200464
13 200260
14 200455
15 201053
16 200452
17 201749
18 199348
19 201046
20 200544

About Daniel D. Heath

Daniel D. Heath is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, Aquatic Science, Ecology and Physiology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (80 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (34 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (24 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (23 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (19 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (15 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (12 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.8k citations), Aquatic Science (880 citations), Physiology (436 citations), Ecology (980 citations) and Genetics (997 citations). Daniel D. Heath has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John W. Heath, Charles W. Fox, Colleen A Bryden, J. Mark Shrimpton, George K. Iwama, Rachel M. Johnson, Bryan D. Neff, Kyle W. Wellband, Derek A. Roff and Margaret F. Docker. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Aquaculture, Molecular Ecology, Heredity and Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact